Jump to content
IGNORED

Paris Olympics 2024


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Hafnia said:

I read Hayley's story Steve yes. Not calling her a man in the same way I wouldn't call a transitioned person their former gender. So stop looking for offence - not biting.  If she never had androgen insensitivity she would be masculine. 

Chromosomes define your biological gender - end of story.  A Y chromosome indicates male. Go take your argument up with professors 

Apologies that I edited my post while you were responding, so our messages crossed. I'd value your thoughts on the final statement, though. Before the age of genetics, there would have been absolutely no issue, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Cornish Steve said:

Apologies that I edited my post while you were responding, so our messages crossed. I'd value your thoughts on the final statement, though. Before the age of genetics, there would have been absolutely no issue, right?

There was issues though. Foekje Dillemma, fortunately women's boxing is a late addition to the games and getting punched in the head with extra power shouldn't be a risk..... but IOC said "hold my beer" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, StatesideToffee14 said:

Something something pointless culture war arguing something something. 

What?!

pointless? A sports governing body putting athletes at risk pointless?

ok..... we will just stick to the likes of the premier league being a laughing stock then eh? 
 

or maybe not... call them all out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I feel there's a lot more at play here than meets the eye. Whether it will all come out is a different matter but I do think there are politics involved in this whole thing when you look into things a bit.

I do think she's a woman but I feel very fucking uncomfortable debating the private medical history of another person, so I'm just not going to get involved in it any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Hafnia said:

What?!

pointless? A sports governing body putting athletes at risk pointless?

ok..... we will just stick to the likes of the premier league being a laughing stock then eh? 
 

or maybe not... call them all out. 

Who was the one who started this whole discussion talking about virtue signalers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Romey 1878 said:

I do think she's a woman but I feel very fucking uncomfortable debating the private medical history of another person, so I'm just not going to get involved in it any more.

This is exactly where I'm at as well. The reaction to this whole story has been beyond stupid. It's weird and creepy for some people (speaking in general here) to act like they have to personally see what is inside a person's pants to confirm whether they're a man or woman. Since apparently it's tough for some to imagine that only men and not women can do something incredible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, StatesideToffee14 said:

Who was the one who started this whole discussion talking about virtue signalers?

I'm not virtue signalling. Far from it.... I think you will find the virtue signallers coming out with nonsense saying that females with male chromosomes should be able to punch women in the head cis it's unfair not make them feel like a woman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Hafnia said:

I'm not virtue signalling. Far from it.... I think you will find the virtue signallers coming out with nonsense saying that females with male chromosomes should be able to punch women in the head cis it's unfair not make them feel like a woman. 

Freudian slip?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Hafnia said:

I'm not virtue signalling. Far from it.... I think you will find the virtue signallers coming out with nonsense saying that females with male chromosomes should be able to punch women in the head cis it's unfair not make them feel like a woman. 

That's the nature of boxing. How many fighters have died as a result of a strong punch in the ring? Personally, I've never understood the attraction of such a sport in the first place given its inherent danger, but I realize I'm in a minority on that one. What about fox hunting or bull fighting, or is it only human life for which we have concern?

The point you raise, though, is valid. Until recent years, we've mostly pretended that those with intersex characteristics were freaks to be ignored or swept under the carpet, no matter how unfair to them. We did this in the past with the physically disabled, but now there are laws to accommodate their needs, and there are the Paralympic Games. This is wonderful. How do we recognize the human worth of those whose gender does not fall into traditional definitions? It's not an easy question to answer. Should they be excluded from all sports? What about shooting or archery? No need. What about running? Should we do away with the male/female divide in sports altogether? Intelligent and compassionate people ought to be able to find a solution that works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, StatesideToffee14 said:

This won't happen while one of side of the discussion is making bad faith arguments. 

Whats the bad faith argument? 
you wanna see a fighter killed before getting this issue sorted??? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hafnia said:

Whats the bad faith argument? 
you wanna see a fighter killed before getting this issue sorted??? 

Right there.

"An individual might make a bad faith argument to undermine their opponent’s position or otherwise “win” a debate. Undermining an opponent might mean pushing them to defend an unrealistic, inaccurate version of their position in an attempt to derail a discussion, change the discussion’s topic, or bait the opponent into an argument."

You're implying anyone who disagrees with you would be happy to see someone die, thus giving yourself a morally superior position....and nobody wants to a see a fatality obviously...bad faith arument

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/bad-faith-good-faith/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MikeO said:

Right there.

"An individual might make a bad faith argument to undermine their opponent’s position or otherwise “win” a debate. Undermining an opponent might mean pushing them to defend an unrealistic, inaccurate version of their position in an attempt to derail a discussion, change the discussion’s topic, or bait the opponent into an argument."

You're implying anyone who disagrees with you would be happy to see someone die, thus giving yourself a morally superior position....and nobody wants to a see a fatality obviously...bad faith arument

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/bad-faith-good-faith/

Unrealistic???

hardly unrealistic. Let's use Connor benn as an example.... clearly was juicing - two samples found levels of clomifene.  Look at his fights pre and post being caught.  Absolutely night and day difference. 

Chris Eubank was livid and rightly so - he was involved in a fight that seen Michael Watson end up almost dead and severely handicapped. Connor benns dad himself had a fight that seen Gerald McLennan in a similar state. 
 

to argue the enhanced testosterone levels in a boxer isn't putting opponents at risk of death is far from unrealistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hafnia said:

Rather than passive aggressive? Fine - I suppose that's the difference between testosterone and estrogen. 

This is why TT is such a great place. We can have intense and emotional disagreements, but no grudges are held and, in a typical British way, humour can break any tension. Thanks for the latest example. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cornish Steve said:

This is why TT is such a great place. We can have intense and emotional disagreements, but no grudges are held and, in a typical British way, humour can break any tension. Thanks for the latest example. :)

Must admit I actually chuckled at my own joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Novak Djokovic wins gold medal match in men's singles tennis in straight sets over Carlos Alcaraz. Gold medal was the only accomplishment that had eluded him in his legendary career.

Scottie Scheffler shoots a course record 62 and wins gold in the men's golf tournament. It's been quite the golf season for Scheffler as he has won 6 tournaments on the PGA Tour this year, including the Masters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, StatesideToffee14 said:

Scottie Scheffler shoots a course record 62 and wins gold in the men's golf tournament. It's been quite the golf season for Scheffler as he has won 6 tournaments on the PGA Tour this year, including the Masters.

Beat an Evertonian into second place, fuck off yourself:shakingfist:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...