Romey 1878 Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 Just now, Matt Tiger said: I understand that wingers are different than outside mids, but we're almost certainly going to line up the same way with two slots available for all three. In terms of the signings we need to bring in I don;t think the distinction has any bearing. Then we don't have as many wingers as you said and signing Gnonto absolutely makes sense. You get him and then we have 4 players with different qualities, that can be used in different ways, and give us different dimensions. Signing Gnonto (or someone else) doesn't mean we won't sign a RB. We definitely want at least one full-back this summer, probably 2. But attack and creativity was our problem last season so it makes absolute sense to direct our funds there. Sev and StevO 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Tiger Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 Just now, Romey 1878 said: Then we don't have as many wingers as you said and signing Gnonto absolutely makes sense. You get him and then we have 4 players with different qualities, that can be used in different ways, and give us different dimensions. Signing Gnonto (or someone else) doesn't mean we won't sign a RB. We definitely want at least one full-back this summer, probably 2. But attack and creativity was our problem last season so it makes absolute sense to direct our funds there. Agreed on having options with different qualities, I'm just not nearly as confident as you seem to be that we'll be bringing in multiple additions after where we are now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 4 minutes ago, Matt Tiger said: Agreed on having options with different qualities, I'm just not nearly as confident as you seem to be that we'll be bringing in multiple additions after where we are now. Why not? Lindstrom (sorry Sev, no idea how to have the o properly) is on loan, so the money from Onana is still there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Tiger Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 2 minutes ago, Romey 1878 said: Why not? Lindstrom (sorry Sev, no idea how to have the o properly) is on loan, so the money from Onana is still there. Because we haven't sold yet and under our current financial conditions (and yes I understand that we should be in a better place from a FFP perspective but who knows) we've spent considerably less than we've taken in on transfers each of hte past two seasons. We're ~$51m net profit so far, so I was assuming we'd spend an additional $30m or so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sev Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 3 minutes ago, Romey 1878 said: Why not? Lindstrom (sorry Sev, no idea how to have the o properly) is on loan, so the money from Onana is still there. I forgive you, my son. Either Alt + 155 or Crtl + Alt + l for ø Matt Tiger, MikeO and Romey 1878 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 Just now, Matt Tiger said: Because we haven't sold yet and under our current financial conditions (and yes I understand that we should be in a better place from a FFP perspective but who knows) we've spent considerably less than we've taken in on transfers each of hte past two seasons. We're ~$51m net profit so far, so I was assuming we'd spend an additional $30m or so. So why couldn't we sign Gnonto and a RB with that? We'll be looking to shift Holgate and Keane on as well, and they'll be wanting out too, so that should bring in some money. Maupay is probably looking for a club in the background as well. Those ones will probably happen later in the window. I'll be surprised if more don't go out, so I don't see it as being an either/or situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 3 minutes ago, Sev said: I forgive you, my son. Either Alt + 155 or Crtl + Alt + l for ø Didn't work. I get ó. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuffRob Posted July 24 Author Report Share Posted July 24 1 hour ago, Sev said: Very pacey compared to Ruffrob... a three toed sloth is consider pacey compared to me!!! Sev 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Tiger Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 Just now, Romey 1878 said: Didn't work. I get ó. For me Alt + 0248 did the trick. Sev 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Tiger Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 2 minutes ago, Romey 1878 said: So why couldn't we sign Gnonto and a RB with that? We'll be looking to shift Holgate and Keane on as well, and they'll be wanting out too, so that should bring in some money. Maupay is probably looking for a club in the background as well. Those ones will probably happen later in the window. I'll be surprised if more don't go out, so I don't see it as being an either/or situation. Our only CB cover is Keane and Holgate, so if we sell them (and frankly I think it'll be hard to sell Holgate, maybe we can get something for keane) we would need to get cb cover as well. If Gnoto deal is 20m (best case) that would leave 10m to get a first team rb (not sure we can find a suitable option for that) and then any money from holgate and keane (I think there will be little if any) to get cb cover. I'll admit these are pretty pessimistic assumptions but given how we've operated the past couple years and the lack of ownership resolution I don't think they're unreasonable. AlbanyNYToffee 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 1 minute ago, Matt Tiger said: Our only CB cover is Keane and Holgate, so if we sell them (and frankly I think it'll be hard to sell Holgate, maybe we can get something for keane) we would need to get cb cover as well. If Gnoto deal is 20m (best case) that would leave 10m to get a first team rb (not sure we can find a suitable option for that) and then any money from holgate and keane (I think there will be little if any) to get cb cover. I'll admit these are pretty pessimistic assumptions but given how we've operated the past couple years and the lack of ownership resolution I don't think they're unreasonable. You said you wanted us to bring in a CB earlier, so we'd have to get rid of at least one of Holgate and Keane anyway. So why is that now a problem? It wouldn't leave £10m for a RB anyway because of how it all works, but we have been linked with one for under £10m. Please get Big Willy's name right or my head might explode . Matt Tiger 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 8 minutes ago, Matt Tiger said: For me Alt + 0248 did the trick. I get nothing at all doing that . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gwlad Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 3 hours ago, Romey 1878 said: It's unbelievable what I've just had to deal with in this thread tbh. First there was the misspelling of Gnonto, then being a witness to Shukes having a conversation with himself about Peter Beagrie. Wake me up before you gno to. Sorry wrong thread. StevO, Romey 1878 and MikeO 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Tiger Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 2 minutes ago, Romey 1878 said: You said you wanted us to bring in a CB earlier, so we'd have to get rid of at least one of Holgate and Keane anyway. So why is that now a problem? It wouldn't leave £10m for a RB anyway because of how it all works, but we have been linked with one for under £10m. Please get Big Willy's name right or my head might explode . Been staring at his name for multiple transfer windows and just now saw the second n. I'm gonna go hibernate for a bit. Romey 1878 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuffRob Posted July 24 Author Report Share Posted July 24 https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/jesper-lindstrom/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/513245 If you look at his 'position played' plan - he looks versitle, might not be that great at some of them, but managers have trusted him enough to use him more than one or twice in many of them. Should have fairly rounded game. Sev 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 Matt and Sev 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post c1982 Posted July 24 Popular Post Report Share Posted July 24 23 minutes ago, Romey 1878 said: Excellent - get this boxed off and official then (gn)onto the next, whoever that may be. Romey 1878, Sev, dunlopp9987 and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MikeO Posted July 24 Popular Post Report Share Posted July 24 1 hour ago, Romey 1878 said: I get nothing at all doing that . Copy/paste from @Sev,s posts = ø. No problem. If that still challenges you I'd suggest going to @Palfy for advice Romey 1878, Palfy, Matt and 2 others 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sev Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 2 minutes ago, MikeO said: Copy/paste from @Sev,s posts = ø. No problem. If that still challenges you I'd suggest going to @Palfy for advice Just if it ever should happen, here's both, ø and Ø. What the hell, let me throw in the rest: æ Æ, å Å for eventually copy/paste. Ah yes, should we sign or be rumoured with any from Sweden or Germany: ö Ö, ä Ä and the famous german ß ... Pleased with the signing of Lindstrøm and hope Dyche dare to use him. Romey 1878 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patto Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 It takes so long to sign a player these days it's so frustrating agents have caused all this pure greed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dunlopp9987 Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 6 minutes ago, patto said: It takes so long to sign a player these days it's so frustrating agents have caused all this pure greed. Considering that this thread was only started a week ago, I'd say this has actually been one of the more expeditious deals we've done in a while AlbanyNYToffee, Romey 1878 and StevO 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 2 hours ago, Romey 1878 said: Didn't work. I get ó. Just try Ctrl + Alt + Del Romey 1878 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 22 minutes ago, patto said: It takes so long to sign a player these days it's so frustrating agents have caused all this pure greed. Clubs now use agents. So we if the agent is the problem the clubs are just as much to blame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palfy Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 44 minutes ago, MikeO said: Copy/paste from @Sev,s posts = ø. No problem. If that still challenges you I'd suggest going to @Palfy for advice I’m unavailable for any advice Sev and MikeO 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shukes Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 So is he as good as Beagrie, the north eastern bomber? And can he do cartwheels! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romey 1878 Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 58 minutes ago, StevO said: Just try Ctrl + Alt + Del Fuck off, Steve! MikeO, Sev and StevO 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patto Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 1 hour ago, StevO said: Clubs now use agents. So we if the agent is the problem the clubs are just as much to blame. We use agents because we have no alternative Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevO Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 12 minutes ago, patto said: We use agents because we have no alternative We use agents because every football club uses agents. There isn’t an alternative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patto Posted July 24 Report Share Posted July 24 26 minutes ago, StevO said: We use agents because every football club uses agents. There isn’t an alternative. That’s what I said StevO and Matt Tiger 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Zoo 2.0 Posted July 24 Popular Post Report Share Posted July 24 5 hours ago, Romey 1878 said: Didn't work. I get ó. 5 hours ago, Matt Tiger said: For me Alt + 0248 did the trick. 5 hours ago, Romey 1878 said: I get nothing at all doing that . 3 hours ago, MikeO said: Copy/paste from @Sev,s posts = ø. No problem. If that still challenges you I'd suggest going to @Palfy for advice 3 hours ago, Sev said: Just if it ever should happen, here's both, ø and Ø. What the hell, let me throw in the rest: æ Æ, å Å for eventually copy/paste. Ah yes, should we sign or be rumoured with any from Sweden or Germany: ö Ö, ä Ä and the famous german ß ... Pleased with the signing of Lindstrøm and hope Dyche dare to use him. You bunch of øld cunts. MikeO, Sev, StevO and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.