My whole argument is based on this:
Lots of guys are branding Suarez a cheat based on that challenge, and claim he is rolling around play acting. The video evidence suggests there was contact. Had it showed there was no contact, he would clearly be cheating. Because it 'does' show contact, then there is the possibility that he may have been in pain. Because it is possible, you can no longer call him a cheat with 100% conviction. Despite there being evidence, some of you choose to dismiss the evidence, or insist he couldn't possibly be in pain.
I'm not contradicting myself Matt, as I see the leg bend, and Suarez in agony, so it's fair to say that there is pain, as that leg trauma would cause pain. To say it wouldn't hurt, despite seeing that is absurd.
Being fair minded isn't about agreeing, but about looking at the facts, and considering them. Being not fair minded is dismissing their relevance, and calling him a cheat.
Make your own minds up.
Was it a foul worthy of a red card? No.
Was Suarez cheating? No, I don't think he was.